What is now in the design of abortion pro-life movements. Now, the term miscarriage or abortion, no longer merely indicates that che attiene alla sfera dell'interruzione di gravidanza instaurata. La gravidanza, per definizione accolta anche dall'OMS,si instaura nel momento in cui si perfeziona l'impianto dell'uovo fecondato (allo stadio di blastula)nella parete uterina. Tuttavia, questa definizione di gravidanza non è condivisa dagli esponenti dell'ideologia pro vita, che, in ogni caso, ritengono sufficiente, per parlare di aborto, la distruzione della cellula uovo fecondata anche se ciò avvenga per effetto di naturale deterioramento, come conseguenza dell'impossibilità di impiantarsi causata da uno specifico intervento umano. Per questo motivo, i medici cattolici, fanno rientrare nella nozione di aborto anche a range of contraceptives that prevent pregnancy by inhibiting implantation of a fertilized egg in the uterus or who are simply suspected of being able to have this effect, although at marginal - intrauterine device (IUD or coil) -morning-after pill (NorLevo, LEVONELLE) -progestogen-only pill (Cerazette) -estrogen-progestogen combination with low dose ethinyl oestradiol (15mcg)-based contraceptive pill mifepristone alone (5 mg per day) Unfortunately, that will hardly spread precisely because of the ethical reservations pro-life movement (but if he had been summarized in the '40s, it would probably be immediately entered the market) * ZENIT - The unspoken abortifacient effects of hormonal contraception THE BIRTH ABORT This is in addition to the absolute pro-life opposition to any form of abortion that has been established, even if they occur within the first few weeks (4 - 9) when the embryo is just a fleshy mass or very little structured and, above all, with close to 100% certainty is devoid of any nerve function and brain. Indeed, the prospect that these early pregnancy loss may be facilitated, led them to a fierce war against the irrational pharmaceutical abortion (RU486). Therefore, the current anti-abortion, on behalf of the defense of human life even before there is an individual human organism able to function in its entirety, is opposed not only to the voluntary pregnancy, but also the most efficient means that there are to prevent the onset of pregnancy. Attitude that has serious practical consequences, since the IUD is the only alternative to the pill progestogens for women intolerant of the latter but in need of protection, high efficiency, and morning-after pill is a necessary complement to those who rely solely on condoms. As for the reserves on a very low dose contraceptive progestogens, for the moment appear to be confined at a theoretical level, but can not be excluded that in future they can find a more practical application. Moreover, it is no mystery that the aspiration of the bottom of the pro-life (closely linked to the Catholic world and other Christian movements) would be put out of action, at least, all artificial means of contraception for female use. On the assumption, inter alia, that contraception is not a means truly effective in the prevention of the use of IVG in the strict sense. Abortion is murder? Abortion is certainly an act "occisivo" going to affect human living matter, but is no longer occisivo spermicides or the removal of part of the terminal caecum. The murder presupposes the existence of something that can be biologically and socially defined man, that is at least a full size body that has reached the point where to have their vital functions and sensitivity. Since the embryo is not a man, but soltanto un primordio di organismo umano ancora privo di qualsiasi funzione vitale propria, il fatto che determina la cessazione della sua vita non è omicidio.
Può l'embriocidio essere considerato talmente offensivo per la collettività umana da richiedere interventi proibitivi e repressivi da parte delle legislazioni statali? Assolutamente no. L'eliminazione di un embrione è un atto che riguarda esclusivamente la sfera privata della persona del cui corpo quell'embrione rappresenta il prodotto. L'embrione, entità materiale,priva di qualsiasi forma di soggettività, anche meramente animale, NON può essere considerato come ALTRO rispetto alla donna in whose body and whose body was formed. The embryo is a living entity that exists independently in the outside world, such as a species of animal or plant that is meant to protect ideal reasons for this state power can not intervene in its protection, as such action would result in a very serious violation of women's physical and psychological well as his moral freedom with regard to reproductive choices. Abortion also can not be restricted or prohibited for demographic reasons, because it is not fair that the state face fall on women, which are incurred in a pregnancy is totally unacceptable by mistake, violence or death to the weight of his (among others unwarranted) expectations of population growth in a context where the limitation of births is mainly carried out by means other than abortion. For consistency, then you should also prohibit any form of contraception and the same abstinence from heterosexual intercourse. definition of abortion in a materialistic perspective. Abortion is the termination of the biochemical processes going on that would transform the product of conception (ie inanimate material resulting from the encounter of two gametes) into a new human organism.